ailooped
I believe the equation is quite simple.
Yes, the AVP is correctly likened to the iPhone, it is in essence the v1 iPhone.iPhone replaced the iPod, but at its core it was a fully fledged, osx touting, wearable computer.
AVP is interesting, it is the iPhone, it is your monitor/screen/iPad. AND it is a fully fledged Mac… The cpu is the same as is on their laptops.IF I was in industry, developing internal software/hardware, I would very much look to grab a full team of experienced game developers for UX development now… I would build a team that can program and make 3d visual systems that integrates with hardware. THAT is where AVP shines. It can interface with production equipment in an unprecedented way.A production line that has realtime visualization of internal components? That can follow every product along the line, think a car… If you use AVP properly, there is a possibility for a manufacturing revolution.
TSMC is ahead of the US because there is expertize along all vectors of production, AVP could bridge the gap… Make a worker with less skill, skilled faster, and an expert when deployed. It is a way around the skill-gap. Or CAN be.
It can be a revolution for repairability, if a transistor blows, the board can show where the fault lies.Apple is marketing this thing kind of in a "cart before the horse way" Pushing the truth as it were, with "spatial computing" before it is apparent. Steve Jobs pushed the fact that it is an iPod, a phone and an internet communicator. Which is enough.
Apple needs to push the actual benefits, it is an IMAX screen in your goggles, it is a stereoscopic camera for capturing your memories. AND it is the most powerful VR game machine.
Fully fledged spatial computer is the underlying fact, and people who see the value in that will pick it up.
Moderator's note: We trimmed out about 20 extra line spaces at the end of the message, and that's all.
