So an AI model analyzes songs on various services. But before that occurs, the AI model has to be allowed access to that material. That means a human has to allow the AI model to do that, presumably through a subscription. So, there's really no legal or moral basis to say that AI isn't allowed to listen. Moreover, it hasn't apparently occurred to the Music Dinosaurs that if someone gives AI a prompt like the one above, it means the they are interested in Taylor Swift, Bruno Mars, and Harry Styles. Repeat this, and it only increases the chances of more awareness of the artists. It's something that content creators and even publishers have figured out with YouTube. Why would AI be any different?
Once again, the music business is a generation behind in technology and its effect on their business model. They are like a dinosaur in quicksand. A generation ago, file-sharing nearly destroyed the business, all because these companies didn't have the foresight to create a usable, simple and economical way of purchasing digital music. So, their response was to go Defcon One on not just companies but individuals (as to make an example of them). This paved the way for Apple's iTunes Music Store, which they were also slow on embracing. Now we're in the streaming age, and the shortsighted hubris continues.
Pixelmator Photo gets renamed Photomator, adds AI features
iOSMac技巧之在苹果电脑屏幕顶部菜单栏置顶显示一句重要的提示:One Thing Apple