I had the same thought jetpilot did - I'm using the Apple wired magic kbd and it has the function key in the same place. I actually find it convenient that it's there, now that I'm finally used to it, as I tend to use only the sound-related function keys (as opposed to the f-keys, use of which is evenly distributed), so I can hit the fn modifier and the sound key with one hand. Anyway, given the target market, I think you should remove that "con" from the review.
In fact, this kbd is clearly made to be an exact duplicate of the Apple one; the eject key is also in the same place. I wonder how people using this with windows machines (or with windows virtuals on their macs, more commonly?) hit the "ins" key when they need to?
I also agree that it's worth mentioning the lack of touchID. Of course it's unsurprising, but it's the one key point of difference with Apple's current kbd, and one that easily justifies the additional cost - at least for some people. I just set up my MBP so the touchID is easily reachable even when sitting at my wired kbd at my desk, so for me it's not needed, but if I were, say, using a Studio, I would definitely drop the extra money on the Apple kbd with touchID - it's astoundingly convenient compared to typing pws all the time.
